Find Out Whether AIMS is Screwing The Right Hole?
August 20, 2008

Recently, a group of Singaporean bloggers submitted a paper to the Government, outlining proposals for internet deregulation. Along with this AIMS is also planning to make recommendations to revamp our net.
I lifted this from Magnezium’s site “Musing.” I believe, it is the most comprehensive collection of post on the subject to date and he has been very objective to include the views of ALL parties concerned. My goal is to present you all with a 360 degree sweep on the various perspectives voiced, so that you will be better placed to make an informed decision to appraise the recommendations made by AIMS.
Discussed are not only pros and cons of “community regulation,” but also the right to remain anonymous online. Along with what I can only tag as “general concerns” touching on every subject from global trends in internet regulation to the sedition act. It would seem the subject of proposing “change” whether it is AIMS, the Blogger 13 and even the recent indication by MICA to pursue a lighter touch covers an even wider area than originally anticipated. Traditionally, the official line appears to be, we have to rein in the feral net to protect kids and to safeguard the truth; but as many of the articles here point out only too clearly, this is only the tip of the iceberg; what about making the net into a more exciting and happening place? Is there a need to balance organic growth with security? How sure are we that online hate speech isn’t due to some other factors other than the net? Should we be looking somewhere else for the real smoking gun? Is the net held out as the convenient whipping boy again? Who defines “right” and “wrong?” Can we even trust fellow bloggers to lead us without abusing their trust in the absence of good and reliable systems?
Perusing many of the articles, the list of concerns just goes on and on, but one thing remains very certain. The whole discussion appears to be much larger than what AIMS, MICA, PAP, the blogger 13 are trying to accomplish; though these competing interest may push and pull no end. The real challenge as one blogger puts it can be summarized succintly as follows:
“Any idiot can fashion an online Pyongyang. It doesn’t take a whole lot of imagination either; all you need to do is introduce finger printing, mug shots and issue out registration cards and in no time, it will be a very “Kwai Kwai” (goody good) place - but dont be surprise if our net also looks somewhat like down town Pyongyang on air raid drill day. I believe the real challenge must be to strike a happy balance between fashioning something that successfully captures the elan and panache of Paris, New York and Hong Kong, and. Yet still manage to ensure the good currency wins over the bad when we close the accounts at the end of the day. That I believe is planning that it is very hard to top as to do that requires nothing short of imagination and hope.”
Happy Reading
Y2K
—————————————————————
NEW! My Singapore News: Uniqueness of space in Cyberspace
ANOTHER DISCUSSIONhttp://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/09/consider/#comments
http://singaporedaily.net/2008/09/26/daily-sg-26-sep-2008/#comment-2359
http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/09/straits-times-denies-bloggers-right-of-reply/#comment-21318
The Proposal:
Process and Structure:
Community Moderation:
Racial and Religious Hate Speech:
Films (Political or otherwise):
MICA’s Response – Lighter Touch:
Not yet classified:
The Cognitive Dissonance That Lacks AIMS – An Interview With the ASDF / Part 2
Webs@Work: Political Engagement and the Web
My Sketchbook: Solutions for the new media
Singabloodypore: AIMs’ Press Conference
BothSidesOfTheJohorStraits: The Advisory Council on the Impact of New Media on Society; a necessary mouthful?
the(new)mediaslut: SG PM reading this blog?
On Going Thread discussions: http://magnezium.blogspot.com/2008/06/internet-deregulation.html
http://aaron-ng.info/blog/the-sad-state-of-blogosphere.html#comment-18044
The Proposal:
Process and Structure:
- Bloggers’ group proposes sweeping changes in Internet regulation (Press Release)
- Bloggers to send ideas on internet regulation to govt (Today)
- Key concerns about internet deregulation emerge at forum (Yawning Bread)
- A real grassroots initiative by bloggers (Aaron Ng)
- When Good is not so Good – A Study in Consultative Affirmative Action (Brotherhood Press)
- What is Really Wrong With the G-15 Proposal? (Brotherhood Press)
- The Fish For A Day Project – Dissecting the only critical article of the 20-page proposal by 15 bloggers to MICA (Little Bird)
- Superman’s ‘Right’ to Blog Anonymously (Brotherhood Press)
- My Inalienable Right to Remain Anon (Brotherhood Press)
- Do not forget the moral of U Turn signs (redbean)
Community Moderation:
- Community Moderation as an alternative to Internet Regulation in Singapore (Bernard Leong)
- Internet Content Consultative Committee (Gerald Giam)
- Community Moderation: Thoughts from the Internet Regulatory Reform Seminar (Bernard Leong)
- Why we need a bottom-up internet content consultative committee (Cherian George)
- The Fallacy of Community Regulation [1] [2] [3A] [3B] [highly Recommended Reading i.e highest number of referrals][3C] [3D] (Brotherhood Press)
- One Battery Chicken Life Coming Up in the Net? (Brotherhood Press)
- Internet deregulation seminar (One dimensional island)
- After thoughts on the Proposals for Internet freedom in Singapore (Starry Nite)
- Another stupid “anti-community moderation” trash article (Little Bird)
Racial and Religious Hate Speech:
- Maintaining Racial and Religious Harmony through Criminal Law (Mohan Gopalan)
- Why I dissented to the Bloggers’ proposals on the Regulation of Hate Speech on the Internet (Ng E-Jay)
- The Incredible Unlikeness of Being of The Sedition Act – A Critique on “Deregulating The Net.” [1] [2] (FILB)
Films (Political or otherwise):
- Why the Films Act should be trashed (Yawning Bread)
- Political Films and the Ruling Party (Gerald Giam)
- The Economics about Banning Political Films (Bernard Leong)
- For voters, politicians, lift ban on political films (Choo Zheng Xi)
MICA’s Response – Lighter Touch:
- MICA’s reply to bloggers’ Proposals for Internet freedom in Singapore (with commentary by Ng E-Jay)
- Govt looking at lighter touch on Net (Straits Times)
- From light to lighter: Government signals direction of Net regulation (Cherian George)
- Touchy Bloggers or Govt? (The Void Deck)
Not yet classified:
- Prosecute or nothing (Yawning Bread)
- The pigeons are already among us (Yawning Bread)
- Internet freedom: Rights come with responsibilities (Mok Wing Tat)
- Internet should not be subject to the law over and above those that apply in real life (Ng E-Jay)
- Responsibilities and Regulations (Benjamin Cheah)
- Global Trends on Blogger Arrests for 2008 (Bernard Leong)
- Bureaucratic ambiguity and Internet freedom (Straits Times)
- Let people form body to oversee net content (Straits Times)
- Rationality vs political expediency in internet policy (Arun Mahizhnan)
- Freedom in the Net (Sam)
- Why my right to privacy is ultimately a matter of choice – Sex, G-15 bloggers and Samizdat (Brotherhood Press)
- Internet Content: Some control needed (George Lim)
- Let public lend a hand in confronting Internet excess (Zhong Zewei)
- [LEGAL PERSPECTIVE] The Shattered Dreams of the Blogger 15 [1] [2] (Brotherhood Press)
- Cyberspace is No Man’s Land (redbean)
- Yay. Feedback on the April 28 article (Little Bird)
- As a policy proposal it fails (Balderdash)
Gerald Giam: Untangling Singapore’s web of Politics